thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

geekgirl101:

Which was “What if they changed it for a fictional genocide against the Jews that happened in a fictional nation.”

Do I even need to explain all the ways this is a bad idea?

Seriously, Magneto’s origin does not need to be changed

Whenever people are like “But he’d be too old if he had been alive in the forties!” I’m just like…this is a universe where immortality and time travel are both things that exist, Magneto can be as young or as old as the writers want him to be without them having to erase his characters backstory

Considering how comics are, take your pick:

-Mutants age slower

-Trap Magneto in the Savage Land and have it have a Narnia style time slowing property (put Xavier there too), decades outside of the Savage Land are only a few years inside the Savage Land.

-Have Magneto have followers that have anti-aging or time reversing powers.

-Magneto and other important/notable/powerful mutants have been Cloned

-Magneto was put into cryo stasis as part of a prison sentence somewhere. I would personally make it Genosha and have it the reason he takes it over.

-Could have Magneto time travel to the future and come back the wrong year. Could either be Days of Future Past or an Age of Apocalypse style future as a easter egg.

Not hard to keep his origin.

(via thefingerfuckingfemalefury)

cryptotheism:

weaver-z:

weaver-z:

POV you tried to join a forum for Norse mythology enthusiasts

Solidarity with all of the people in the tags who have joined:

• Celtic mythology groups
• Large history-related servers or alternate history writing servers
• Warhammer 40k forums (with lots of imperial guard players)
• Anything related to Ancient Rome
• Random, seemingly innocuous anime servers with little moderation
• Metalhead groups for any band with a Norse or Celtic theme

Whoever tagged this as “#Percy Jackson roleplays on Roblox” has seen some shit

(via hellyeahheroes)

politijohn:

(via hellyeahheroes)

hellyeahheroes:

redbuddi:

itsforexposure:

The reason dept store clothes and the like is cheaper is because they use overseas labor that they can exploit and underpay. If you don’t want to own a sweatshop, and I’m assuming you don’t because most people don’t want to be monsters, you’ll have to charge extra because capitalism is structured so that ethical labor is punished and discouraged.

“capitalism is structured so that ethical labor is punished and discouraged.”

espanolbot2:

afloweroutofstone:

Fun fact about the early Catholic church is that, despite spending generations being persecuted by the Roman empire, it took less than 15 years under Theodosius I to go from “the empire is Catholic now” to “and also every other religion is banned.” You can literally read St. Augustine move from “state religious persecution is unacceptable” to “state religious persecution is cool actually” over his lifetime as Catholicism came to power. I’m sure there’s no broader lessons to be learned there

I remember going to an exhibit about early Christianity in Egypt, and interestingly Egypt in the first century was actually super-cosmopolitan as there were tons of different religions existing more or less side by side. This led to some intermixing to an extent early on, with, for example, artifacts which would have an Egyptian or Roman god on the back with a Christian symbol on the opposite side.

However, as Christianity began to climb in influence it became increasingly hostile towards the other religions that existed along side them, with the exhibit including anecdotes where a Christian would go into a temple for the god Bes (the deity of households, mothers and children), wreck up the place, and then start telling people that they had exorcised a demon from the building by the name of “Besa“. Or another example they had where a Christian went to a temple of Horus and killed the hawk the priests kept there which was meant to represent the god, their idea being that would show that Horus was no longer existed there or something.

And that’s not even getting into the political stuff, like when the philosopher and mathematician Hypatia was killed by a mob in the street because the bishop of Alexandria disliked how a pagan (and a woman) was acting in an advisory capacity for the ruler of the city… With the story of her murder eventually being coopted by Christians several centuries later, where they turned her into the saint Catherine of Alexandria, where instead of being a philosopher who who was noted to teach anyone regardless of their religion who was murdered by a Christian mob, she was instead a Christian martyr who could convert people with Facts and Logic who was killed by a mob of intolerant pagans.

Just like the OP was saying early Christians went from “we are a religion of the downtrodden and excluded“ to “everyone else is wrong, and we’ll convert them by force or kill them if they resist or inconvenience us!“ REALLY fast.

(via hellyeahheroes)

petermorwood:

clevergirlhelps:

Food-Colored Skin

Not only is purple prose obnoxious; sometimes it’s downright racist. For some reason, writers have a fondness for describing dark complexions as “chocolate” or somesuch.

But wait, people like chocolate! What’s so bad about likening a skintone to something almost everyone likes?

The problem is that food-colored skin is a phenomenon mostly limited to dark-colored complexions. And it’s more than just a little creepy when strangers keep likening your skintone to an inanimate edible object. Plus, in some places “chocolate bar” is a playground taunt used to goad black children.

Not a very tasteful choice in similitudes at all.

Skin Color Only Described When Not White

In many stories, the color of a character’s skin will only be described when the character doesn’t have a fair complexion. This typically happens because the writer is white and subconsciously thinks of xir own skin color as the default and everyone else’s as the outliers. Even JK Rowling, whose books frequently focus on tolerance and equality, is guilty of this.

The solution is simple - just describe everyone’s complexion, and all will be well.

Written Accents

Written accents are offensive because they essentially tell the group whose accent is being written that “your way of talking is weird; my way is normal.”

Not only are written accents offensive to the group being represented, but they’re offensive to read because you have to spend extra time trying to sort out what the writer was trying to say.

If you want to write a character who is supposed to have an accent, use grammar and slang associated with people who have that accent. You could also just mention that they have an accent. But don’t butcher the spellings of the words. “He’s got himself in a right pickle, he has” is fine, but “‘E’s got ‘imself in a right pickle, ‘e ‘as” is not.

Things Appropriated From Other Cultures

Many new writers are bound and determined to make sure their characters have meaningful and unique names. I see many people who have clearly scoured the bowels of online baby name sites to find the perfect Vedic/Japanese/Aztec name for their white character.

This sort of thing is a form of cultural appropriation, which is a pretty huge faux pas. For the uninformed, cultural appropriation is when a member of a dominant culture takes something from an oppressed/minority culture and uses it in a shallow, trendy, or superficial way - and there’s really nothing more shallow or superficial than trying to make your character stand out by giving xir an “exotic” name instead of giving xir a memorable personality and story.

Likewise, people give their characters katanas and throw youkai into their stories for no other reason than “it’s more interesting” than Western culture. Throwing things from another culture into your story for no other reason than you think it’s “more interesting” reduces that culture to a cheap gimmick, which is pretty rude and offensive.

“Harmless” Stereotypes

The Japanese plant-lover. The wise Native American. The sexy Latina. There’s nothing bad about loving plants or being wise or sexy, so why would anyone find these offensive?

For one thing, it can create unrealistic expectations and assumptions about these people. Many Asian-Americans find themselves having to explain to people that no, they don’t know squat about gardening, really. Many Latinas would rather people didn’t expect them to be hot and spicy lovers based on their race. And contrary to what some think, Native Americans aren’t really born with a magical connection to the Earth and tend to find assumptions that they are quite irritating.

The Supercrip

There are two varieties of supercrips: the first is a disabled person who is treated as a hero just for doing everyday things that most people take for granted. It’s quite frankly condescending, and many disabled people would thank you to knock it off.

The second type is the character who has amazing skills or abilities because or in spite of xir disability. While a writer might be trying to say “just because a person has a disability, doesn’t mean they can’t be amazing!”, what the audience hears is “disabled people often have amazing abilities to make up for their disability,” which unfortunately isn’t true.

The Mighty Whitey

The Mighty Whitey is a white person (if not physically, then culturally) who finds xirself faced with the task of saving a marginalized group (often as not from other white people). The character is usually male and ends up becoming the leader of the people he just liberated, and he usually ends up with a hot ethnic-looking gal to boink. (Think Jake Sulley fromAvatar, and you’ve got the Mighty Whitey in a nutshell.) The Mighty Whitey will learn the ways of an ethnic group, and xe will become even better at them than the people who have been studying them all their lives.

What makes this trope so horrendous is the attitude of white supremacy: it implies that non-white people cannot solve their problems without a white person to help or even lead them, and that white people will always be better at everything.

Also, becoming a leader of a people whose culture you have only known/studied for a few months - or even a few years - is one of the most ridiculously puerile fantasies in existence.

Getting Mental Illnesses & Different Neurologies Wrong

Want to create a chilling plot twist? Just the killer the hero’s evil alternate personality! That’s called schizophrenia… right?

Wrong. And this type of thing is incredibly insensitive and offensive.

Aside from the fact that schizophrenia does not create multiple personalities, most people with schizophrenia and multiple personalities are quite harmless. Yet thanks to their portrayal in fiction, many people expect them to be dangerous, which makes their already-difficult lives even more difficult.

Occasionally, some people go the other direction and portray these people as innocent or even mystical. That’s positive discrimination, and that’s also bad because it creates unrealistic expectations.

Whether it’s schizophrenia, multiple personlities, autism, Asperger’s, psychopathy, sociopathy, or anything else, you’re going to use a mental disorder or alternate neurology of any kind, make sure you research it. And whatever you do,NEVER give your character a mental illness just to make xir more “interesting,” because that’s ableism.

Trying to Create an Aesop About Discrimination Without Actually Understanding the Discrimination in Question

Most people think they have a pretty good bead on what racism is all about - it’s about segregation, ugly slurs, and pointy white hats. Same goes with sexism - women can get jobs and vote now, so it must be over, right? Ha, if only.

In real life, these people are very rarely overt - in fact, most racism is extremely subtle, so subtle that the offender doesn’t even realize that what they’ve said or done is offensive or hurtful and will vehemently deny the possiblity that what they said or did could have been offensive. (A common response from these people is “I can’t be an X-ist! I have X friends!” Yeah, if only.)

Some examples of subtle discrimination:

• Telling rowdy children to “stop running around like a bunch of wild Indians!”
• Describing a non-white character or person as “exotic.”
• Dressing up in Halloween costumes depicting ethnic stereotypes.
• Insisting that a woman who does not want children right now will “change her mind” in the future.
• Asking a woman why she’s still single if she’s so attractive.
• Asing a woman who is angry about something if she’s on her period.
• Insulting males who don’t live up to expectations of perceived masculinity by accusing them of acting “girly” or calling them gay.

If you want to learn more about what real discrimination of all kinds look and feel like, I recommend readingMicroaggressions. (Language warning.) Also, check out this handy-dandy list of links to privilege checklists so you can check your own privilege before writing off into the sunset.

Trying to Satirize a Thing Without Understanding Why it’s a Thing

The film Death Becomes Her satirizes the perceived vanity of performers who spend mind-blowing amounts of money on beauty products and plastic surgeries to stay young. Funny film? Yes. But it’s rather sexist in that it treats this perceived vanity as something that just happens to some women for no real reason. It ignores the fact that we live in a society obsessed with youth and that our consumerist culture has commodified it and tries to make us feel inferior every day for not buying it from them. It ignores the fact that the men in control of the entertainment industry constantly pressure women into getting plastic surgery and enhancements, even flat-out refusing to hire women who don’t meet their exact standards of beauty, regardless of their talent.

Killing Off LGBT Characters to Make an Allegedly Non-Hateful Point

There’s this thing that some writers do - they introduce an LGBT character, try to build some some sympathy for xir, and before you know it they’ve killed off this character in a manner that’s reminiscent of that old and noxious “too good for this sinful Earth” trope that pervaded Puritan literature.

This sends an absolutely terrible message to LGBT people - that the only way they can escape the shame and the hate that so often comes with being LGBT is if they die. LGBT youth are at a higher risk of committing suicide already - clearly, this is not a message we want to be sending.

Forgetting Women of Color in Female-Oriented Entertainment

Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Charmed. Pan Am. Sex in the City. All of these female-aimed shows exhibit distinctly monochrome casting choices. Sure, Charmed was sort of justified in that the three leads were supposed to be sisters. But Pan Am has no excuse - and there were plenty of non-white stewardesses in the 60’s.

Multi-Racial Groups Always With a White at the Helm

This wouldn’t be a problem if it didn’t keep happening all the time. But invariably, whenever there’s a multi-racial group or team of some kind, the leader will invariably be white. The implication is that while non-whites are good enough to have on a team, they still aren’t leadership material.

The Fairytale Gypsy

You know the character type - they live in wagons, wear colorful clothing, read fortunes, and play a mean fiddle.

The trouble is, what you see in fiction is a romanticized version of a very ugly reality: “Gypsy” is actually a racial slur for the Roma and Dom people. The reason they’re nomads is because racists have a habit of routing them out whenever they try to settle down, and their eclectic fashion comes from having to wear whatever they can get. Also, they’re no more magical than you or me.

Their portrayal in many fantasies perpetuates the myth that these people are fairytale creatures who vanished along with Long Ago And Far Away, rather than real people who suffer systemic oppression today.

Many of these appear as TV Tropes.

• “Starbucks Skin Scale” is a subsection of “Race Tropes”;
  
• “Bury Your Gays” is a subsection of “Queer As Tropes”;
• “Funetik Aksent” is a subsection of “Accent Tropes”;
  
• “Magical Romani” (also “Gypsy Curse”, oh dear) are subsections of “Europe / Useful Notes”

And so on.

YMMV about how the website has organised or even named them, but IMO they’re a useful compilation of How It’s Been (and is still being) Done, Who Did (and is still doing) It, and may provide ideas as to Better Ways To Do It Next Time.

(via hellyeahheroes)

elizascarlets:

:

vampmilf:

i am begging you all to stop treating this site like instagram if you dont want it to be content free by next year

actually i’m reblogging this again with commentary, fuck it.

There’s people in the notes talking about “not basing your worth off numbers”, and like. that isn’t what this post is about. It’s not a threat, either, it’s a comment on how this site works, at a mechanical level.

Likes are worthless. Let me say that again.

Likes. Are. Worthless.

They don’t do anything. They’re a bookmark. They were never part of how tumblr works - in the early days we didn’t even have a like button, and the site still more or less acts as though we don’t. They’re personal bookmarks and the only people who “get” anything from them are you (you bookmark the post) and the OP (maybe a very slight serotonin boost), but they don’t keep the post in circulation, they don’t keep it alive.

Without reblogs, a post will be dead in the water within an hour. No matter how good it is, no matter how many hours of painstaking love and attention its creator put into it, it will be dead within an hour and never seen again. It gets pushed down the dashboard and nobody aside from the followers who were online when it was posted will see it.
And there’s a huge difference in engagement on posts that get even one lucky reblog from someone with wider reach - that one reblog shows your post to five, ten, fifteen other people, and if one of those people also reblogs it, and so on and so forth, that’s how posts stay alive and in circulation.
It’s like a contagion, but we’re sharing creativity instead of disease.

And that matters. That “lifespan” of the post matters, artists and writers give up on this site and go to sites where posts have longer lifespans because it sucks to spend hours of your life, maybe even days, to get two notes and some fucking pocket lint for your efforts.
We create for ourselves, but we share because we want people to see it, because that engagement offers positive feedback and encouragement to continue.
But more than that, if every post (whether art, fic, gifset, whatever) is dying within an hour or a day of being posted, that means it’s not making it onto your dashboard. And if it’s not on your dashboard, you won’t see it. This kills the site, after a while. You stop seeing the posts, because nobody is putting them on your dashboard, because this site doesn’t have an algorithm like twitter and insta’s and it shouldn’t, it’s the last bastion of chronological timelines.

Forgive my giant fucking rant I am so tired right now and full of the plague but like stop acting like artists and writers are just being whiny little babies, or “threatening” to withhold our fucking work (you’re not entitled to it! it’s ours! if we get nothing out of sharing it we’re well within our rights to keep it private!) when we say this site will dry up without reblogs. We’re just stating facts.

also I’ve seen some people in the tags say ‘oh there have always been more likes on posts’ no there haven’t ???? 

these are posts from 2013, look at the ratio

not to sound like a nursing home resident but back then people know that the point of this site was to reblog things and share them, not to bury them away among your other 23k liked posts

(via ayellowbirds)

funnytwittertweets:

(via hellyeahheroes)